home Main feed Recent help_outline Ask Share settings Settings
language
×
العربية English German
search
×

Search

home Main feed Recent help_outline Ask content_copy Copy Question settings Settings

Date

 Date


اللغة:


Font Size:


Night | Day mode

brightness_auto
menu search
brightness_auto
🤖 AI Notice: This translation was generated by AI and is currently awaiting human verification.
more_vert
A discussion on the historical figure Al-Mukhtar Al-Thaqafi and the differing opinions about him. [AR_ID:923]
thumb_up_off_alt 0 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike

1 Answer

more_vert
Peace be upon you. The status of Al-Mukhtar bin Abi Ubaidah Al-Thaqafi has been extensively discussed by Sayyid Al-Khoei, who wrote about him in detail, summarizing his views in about eight pages. He categorized the reports regarding Al-Mukhtar into two sections: 1. **Positive Narrations**: These are numerous and include reports such as one narrated from Abu Abdullah (peace be upon him) stating that no Hashimite woman had adorned herself until Al-Mukhtar sent them the heads of those who killed Hussein (peace be upon him). Another narration from Abu Ja'far (peace be upon him) advises against insulting Al-Mukhtar, as he avenged our slain, sought justice for us, married our widows, and distributed wealth among us in times of hardship. 2. **Negative Narrations**: These accuse him of being a liar and of fabricating stories about Ali bin Al-Hussein (peace be upon him). However, these negative reports are very weak in terms of their chain of transmission. Even if they were authentic, they would not surpass the negative reports about figures like Zurara, Muhammad bin Muslim, and others, and thus do not harm Al-Mukhtar's status or his righteousness. Allama Majlisi also mentioned both the positive and negative reports about Al-Mukhtar in his book 'Malaadh Al-Akhyaar' and ultimately expressed his opinion, suggesting that it might be safer to refrain from taking a definitive stance, even though there are more positive reports about Al-Mukhtar in the narrations from the Imams (peace be upon them). In summary, Al-Mukhtar was a man who valiantly fought for his cause, and his enemies sought to undermine him by spreading accusations and lies. Given that his opponents were dominant and their influence extended beyond him, it is natural that these lies would be framed in supported narratives, entering history under the guise of legitimacy, especially when historians collect reports without thorough investigation or when they align with their biases. May you be guided towards all that is good.
thumb_up_off_alt 0 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike

No related questions found

All rights reserved - Quoting is permitted with proper attribution
2024
...