home Main feed Recent help_outline Ask Share settings Settings
language
×
العربية English German
search
×

Search

home Main feed Recent help_outline Ask content_copy Copy Question settings Settings

Date

 Date


اللغة:


Font Size:


Night | Day mode

brightness_auto
menu search
brightness_auto
🤖 AI Notice: This translation was generated by AI and is currently awaiting human verification.
more_vert
A person has been smoking for 10 years, and the ruling regarding the invalidity of smoking during Ramadan existed before that time. However, he is unaware of this ruling. What is the judgment in this case? Additionally, can we know when the ruling was issued so we can base our understanding on it?
thumb_up_off_alt 0 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike

1 Answer

more_vert

Peace be upon you and God's mercy and blessings.

Ayatollah Al-Sistani (may God protect him):

The fast of an ignorant person who is not deliberately neglectful is not deemed invalid, aside from eating, drinking, and sexual intercourse, which are the known invalidators. If he relied on a legitimate argument or was genuinely unaware of the ruling, then his fast is valid.

Source: Minhaj al-Salihin, Vol. 1, Supplement on Committing Invalidators by Mistake, Coercion, or Necessity


Ayatollah Al-Khamenei (may God protect him):

Your fast is considered invalid as a precautionary measure, but you are not required to make expiation.

Source: Message on Prayer and Fasting, Fasting, Cases of Obligation for Qadha and Expiation for Deliberate Actions

May you be successful in all good.

thumb_up_off_alt 0 like thumb_down_off_alt 0 dislike

No related questions found

All rights reserved - Quoting is permitted with proper attribution
2024
...